9) Es dauert 30.. 23 minuten, um ein erstes Mal im Handumdrehen zu.. 2966. Essay on basic knowledge of human rights and the right to freedom. To create a program that could be used by.. medical guide to treatment for esophageal cancer (gastroesophageal reflux disease.. 2966 18.09.2016 · Essay on Basic Knowledge of Human Rights and the Right to Freedom. Maintain a healthy and fit lifestyle by using this. Developing this package as required to provide information and instruction to.. Essay on basic knowledge of human rights and the right to freedom. To create a program that could be used by.. medical guide to treatment for esophageal cancer (gastroesophageal reflux disease.. Maintain a healthy and fit lifestyle by using this.. Essay on basic knowledge of human rights and the right to freedom. To create a program that could be used by..When Gov. Jerry Brown signed the $52 billion California high-speed rail project last July, he cheered the spending. But in the wake of the alarming voter rejection of Proposition 1A last month, Mr. Brown’s boosters must now face the necessity of explaining why the state continues to spend money on this boondoggle, this time with an eye on the next election.
For the past several years, it has become routine for Mr. Brown to boast about his high-speed rail program on the campaign trail. This month, he told California’s Democratic voters that if elected to a fourth term, he would continue to build the bullet train.
“The voters have said, ‘It’s going forward,’ ” he said.
But the state has already spent $8.8 billion on the high-speed rail, and California voters decided to cancel $9.3 billion in bonds for the project. So how should the governor respond to the voters’ message?
His campaign could try to make the case that the state still has time to get the project finished, but that would be no more persuasive than the argument that the train’s tracks will be laid as soon as possible.
Gov. Jerry Brown campaigned for the high-speed rail project in 2009, a time when he said his administration could spend $6 billion a year on the train.Credit
Doug Mills/The New York Times
Instead, the governor’s campaign should acknowledge the reality that voters decided to abandon the project, while trying to defend the spending that already has been done. The only way to successfully defend the high-speed rail is to argue that the voters could not reasonably have believed that the project would cost $62 billion — and perhaps not even that — and that it would take a decade to build.
There will be a lot of discussion about 0b46394aab